Y10 Econ Comparative Advantage
Farmland and Techland
Country | Bread (units) | Smartphones (units) |
---|---|---|
Farmland | 100 | 50 |
Techland | 90 | 120 |
Who Has the Absolute Advantage?
Country | Bread (units) | Smartphones (units) |
---|---|---|
Farmland | 100 | 50 |
Techland | 90 | 120 |
- In Bread? Farmland (100 > 90)
- In Smartphones? Techland (120 > 50)
- Should they trade?
Comparative Advantage
A country has a comparative advantage
if it can produce a good with a lower opportunity cost.
- It’s not about being the best, it’s about losing the least.
Calculate Opportunity Cost
We need to find the opportunity cost of producing 1 unit of each good.
Opportunity Cost = (What you Lose) / (What you Gain)
Country | Bread (units) | Smartphones (units) |
---|---|---|
Farmland | 100 | 50 |
Techland | 90 | 120 |
Farmland Opportunity Cost
It can make 100 Bread or 50 Smartphones.
To produce 1 Bread, Farmland gives up:
OC of 1 Bread = 50 Smartphones / 100 Bread = 0.5 Phones
To produce 1 Phone, Farmland gives up:
OC of 1 Phone = 100 Bread / 50 Smartphones = 2 Bread
Group Work: Calculate for Techland
Country | Bread (units) | Smartphones (units) |
---|---|---|
Farmland | 100 | 50 |
Techland | 90 | 120 |
- What is the OC of 1 Bread?
- What is the OC of 1 Smartphone?
Now Compare Opportunity Costs
Opportunity Cost of 1… | Farmland | Techland |
---|---|---|
Bread (in Phones) | 0.5 | 1.33 |
Smartphone (in Bread) | 2.0 | 0.75 |
- Who has the lower OC for Bread? Farmland (0.5 < 1.33)
- Who has the lower OC for Phones? Techland (0.75 < 2.0)
Who has the comparative advantage?
Opportunity Cost of 1… | Farmland | Techland |
---|---|---|
Bread (in Phones) | 0.5 | 1.33 |
Smartphone (in Bread) | 2.0 | 0.75 |
- Farmland has a
Comparative Advantage
in Bread. It gives up fewer phones to make bread. - Techland has a
Comparative Advantage
in Smartphones. It gives up less bread to make phones.
Vocabulary
Specialize
,specialization
(专业化)- Focus on producing something to produce more efficiently.
Why Trade
Countries should specialize
in the good for which they have a comparative advantage
and then trade.
Without specialization
If they try to do Bread and Phones equally:
- Farmland: 50 Bread, 25 Phones
- Techland: 45 Bread, 60 Phones
- World Total: 95 Bread, 85 Phones
With Specialization
- Farmland ( specializes in Bread): Produces 100 Bread, 0 Phones
- Techland ( specializes in Phones): Produces 0 Bread, 120 Phones
- World Total: 100 Bread (+5), 120 Phones (+35)
Now they can trade.
They can now trade so both have more of both goods than they started with!
e.g., Farmland trades 40 Bread to Techland for 40 Phones.
- Farmland ends with: 60 Bread, 40 Phones (More of both!)
- Techland ends with: 40 Bread, 80 Phones (More of both!)
Takeaway: Why Trade?
Absolute advantage
: Can I produce more than you (Not a good reason to trade)Comparative advantage
: Is my opportunity cost lower than yours? (Yes? Good reason to trade.)- Everyone benefits by specializing in what they are best at producing.
Group Work:
Colombia can produce 60 tons of Coffee OR 30 tons of Coconuts. Bolivia can produce 20 tons of Coffee OR 20 tons of Coconuts.
- Who has an absolute advantage in Coffee? In Coconuts?
- Calculate the opportunity cost for Coffee and Coconuts in each country.
- Who has a comparative advantage in each good?
- Should they trade? Why or why not?